Comments for The GenetiBlog

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by Juggernaut004

Juggernaut004 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:12:49 +0000

I’m thinking of becoming a doctor…Does anyone think that some type of physics course will assist me in the medical field? (No, I’m NOT being sarcastic).

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by yoyaya007

yoyaya007 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:08:08 +0000

u need to take Ethics courses, u don’t need physics!

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by yoyaya007

yoyaya007 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:36:59 +0000

i love u walter lewin.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by yterminio

yterminio — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:29:30 +0000

Absolutely. Physics is a must for anyone planning a career in medicine. Chemistry and Biology seem more obvious but Physics provides an overview of science which is the foundation of the other two.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by kmehindru41

kmehindru41 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:59:57 +0000

brilliant……….

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:28:32 +0000

@yoyaya007

You need all.

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by ChocolateExplosion

ChocolateExplosion — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:45:44 +0000

awesome

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by blackrainuponus

blackrainuponus — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:44:44 +0000

Isn’t it Octopi?

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:42:20 +0000

@Juggernaut004

yes. Learn Electronics to get chemistry and (X) ray machines principles familiar to you. Basicly, learn all chemistry and physics from the persoective to learn to understand how all scopes and machines really work. That gives you real view.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:40:11 +0000

@Juggernaut004

Look my favorites if need guidance….

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:39:36 +0000

@yterminio

Thats true. Physics, electrophysics and quantum physics are the true base to research biology and medicines thise days. Modern understanding is based whit thise two diciplines.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:01:27 +0000

@drunkdonutboy

I have no doupt about existence of Infinite God. Thats basic physics.

From nothing by nothing comes nothing.
All that is is under motion, and motion needs _Force to start.

By this Gods names is the Creator. The First.

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by PurushaDesa

PurushaDesa — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:49:23 +0000

That MAY have been debunked on QI, if I remember correctly. I think it’s octopuses. In fact my spell check just confirmed it.

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by blackrainuponus

blackrainuponus — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:30:15 +0000

Well then, glad I stated it as a question instead of “Hey, it’s octopi.”

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by thejugglenaut91

thejugglenaut91 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:11:42 +0000

it may be basic physics but what about advanced physics? i.e. things that are being researched as we speak. Don’t invoke science if you don’t know what you’re talking about.

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by PurushaDesa

PurushaDesa — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:51:02 +0000

Well I said “I think” so I hope I conveyed some uncertainty.

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by blackrainuponus

blackrainuponus — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:50:13 +0000

Well…I went to wikipedia…

The octopus (pronounced /ˈɒktəpəs/, from Greek Ὀκτώπους, ‘eight-footed’,[1] with plural forms: octopuses [ˈɒktəpəsɪs], octopi [ˈɒktəpaɪ], or octopodes [ˌɒkˈtəʊpədiːs],

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:24:14 +0000

When something is effective, then its defined as force no matter what.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by thejugglenaut91

thejugglenaut91 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:20:36 +0000

and what does what this says have to do with you thinking that an infinite creator god is rigorously and mathematically formulated from basic physics.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:55:45 +0000

Because of the fact of movement. To start movement there is force. Everything is moving.
Second fact “from nothing by nothing comes nothing”

It is named that “that” indefined force that is starter of change is God. It is essential thing. Thats physical fact.

You call it as you like, but the facts will never change. You cant divede undivadable. Wellcome to modern age.

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by PurushaDesa

PurushaDesa — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:53:10 +0000

‘Octopodes’?! Surely you didn’t anticipate that?

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:42:41 +0000

And obviously this creaton of the universe is effect, and marvelous creation. You cant say unvierse is its cause, because it become after. Thats called reverse.

Universe exist, because of its caused by other force to be. The Ability to do that, is called creating out of nothing. Thats ability of God. To get deep essence, you dont play whit words. You deal whit essence, meaning roots of existece.

I think thats enough for this time.

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by blackrainuponus

blackrainuponus — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:23:31 +0000

I did not indeed.

I shall however from now on when referring to them use the term octopodes because that is by far my favorite of the three.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:09:18 +0000

If you deny Gods ability, you dont understand realitys reality at basic level. Of course God exist. Who´s religion is right? That is different question. That has real answer only from the roots of the exitence. Eveybody walks whit his own style of understanding.

what path you serve?

Comment on Ancient American Astrologic Masters pt.3/5 by tooblack09

tooblack09 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:05:40 +0000

Wow its amazing how dark they are!!!!!!!

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:59:40 +0000

or should I say, what god you worship essencies of your actions? Thats purpouse of life, if you understand anything.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:57:06 +0000

To what Force do you Submit yourself to?
To what direction and to what meaning. Do you know how to submit to the Ultimate? To the Hidden God. Do you know the secrets…..

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by PurushaDesa

PurushaDesa — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:44:46 +0000

Yeah, right! It’s your favourite because when someone says, “Fuck off!”, you can go, “Well actually…”

Comment on Ancient American Astrologic Masters pt.3/5 by moorishbrooklyn

moorishbrooklyn — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:27:08 +0000

The original inhabitants of all the lands and the pyramids builders were all dark, so were the builders of Stonehenge.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:57:08 +0000

You said what you have to say. I did the same.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:54:26 +0000

I can only say. That I dont think so. Scientific search for the truth. Mmm. Its wide. Knowing God is there too. By the name Subtle.

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by TheMorningCoffee

TheMorningCoffee — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:51:57 +0000

I pity you and this other guy here, you are both so busy trying to be intellectual and engage each other in witty banter, you fail to focus on anything of real value and will perpetuate this ego trip through your entire lives totally missing any points of wisdom. Such a shame.

Comment on Ancient American Astrologic Masters pt.3/5 by x11115

x11115 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:43:56 +0000

I don’t think your right about stonehenge.

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by TheMorningCoffee

TheMorningCoffee — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:33:40 +0000

I pity you and this other guy here, you are both so busy trying to be intellectual and engage each other in witty banter, you fail to focus on anything of real value. Such a shame.

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by PurushaDesa

PurushaDesa — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:19:24 +0000

You’re being asinine. It just occurred to us what the plural should be.

I wouldn’t have watched the entire series from start to finish and added them all to my playlists if I wasn’t interested in them.

If you want to start a new conversation then do so without making derisory remarks about someone else’s.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:16:09 +0000

Sorry. I am not looking for anything to explane to you. Sorry. Too much work.

Take care.

Comment on Ancient American Astrologic Masters pt.3/5 by x11115

x11115 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:14:34 +0000

Mayans are a dark people. They may be mixed with Africans that also had migrated to areas of Mexico. Ironically the oldest know sculls in that area may be of european stock dating 12-14 thousand yrs ago. Dr Silvia Gonzalez conducted a study of ancient bones found in Mexico and found that they have very different characteristics to Native Americans. And actually the native americans are blocking this evidence. This may be one of many skulls disproving Indians as the original people.

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by blackrainuponus

blackrainuponus — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:09:51 +0000

All knowledge is important. Big or small. Is it so horrible that I learned something from this video that doesn’t really have to do with evolutionary biology?

I mean really I knew pretty much everything he was talking about already because I’ve already read/watched a great deal on that subject. I however knew very little about octopodes, and now I know a thing or two about them. Learning isn’t a “shame”.

Octopodes are interesting, and if you don’t agree, you can fuck off.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by thejugglenaut91

thejugglenaut91 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:06:48 +0000

1stly that last comment was not towards you, 2ndly I’ve read every popular holy book. You name it, the bible, quran, the book of the dead, etc. 3rdly you obviously are looking to explain everything to me, you’re just too confused to be able to do so. Otherwise you wouldn’t have come back a day after I commented.
This is really stupid and in respect to Mr. Lewin this is over. Why don’t you go through the videos and you might learn something because you obviously know nothing.

Comment on Ancient American Astrologic Masters pt.3/5 by moorishbrooklyn

moorishbrooklyn — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:06:36 +0000

you said THINK, therefore you are not sure, but I am.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by iamsnail

iamsnail — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:57:37 +0000

Those that I wrote today. I deleted. BEcause I saw, hey. You wrote those yesterday, but I did not saw them.

Comment on Mod-2 Lec-19 Functions of Complex Variables Part – 1 by sraj001

sraj001 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:35:52 +0000

Thank you for such a wonderful lecture – it cant get simpler than this!

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by TheMorningCoffee

TheMorningCoffee — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:31:24 +0000

This comment of yours further proves your ignorance.

Comment on Ancient American Astrologic Masters pt.3/5 by moorishbrooklyn

moorishbrooklyn — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:25:08 +0000

The Mayans and the Africans come from the same family, they were not mixed. Which Europeans are you referring to, Europe is really west Asia. The first people in west Asia or what we call Europe today were dark or melanated, known as the Grimaldi Moors or Grimaldi Africans. The pale Europeans are only 6,000 years old on the planet, so it could not have been the pale ones.

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by TheMorningCoffee

TheMorningCoffee — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:18:21 +0000

I pity you.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by DarkShroom

DarkShroom — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:59:44 +0000

@iamsnail oh please do you god nuts have to leave comments on physics videos, can’t you just stick to theology or somthing

Comment on Ancient American Astrologic Masters pt.3/5 by tooblack09

tooblack09 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:58:40 +0000

Thanks for your reply, as moorishbrooklyn said I’m not sure which Europeans you are talking about. If you notice everyone is talking about the Mayas, but nobody on tv is talking about the black Olmecs of mexico. You should research them as well as the Egyptians and Nubians and you will see everything will come together.

Comment on Introduction | MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 by psycool666

psycool666 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:40:30 +0000

I really appreciate this effort of MIT University …….it would B even more better if other Universities followed it too!

Comment on Mod-2 Lec-19 Functions of Complex Variables Part – 1 by lionizingrome

lionizingrome — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:40:27 +0000

Very good lecture!

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by blackrainuponus

blackrainuponus — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:32:15 +0000

Please do explain to me…how is learning about something a thing of ignorance? I’m fairly sure learning is the exact opposite of ignorance. Of course that could just be ignorant thinking.

Comment on Ancient American Astrologic Masters pt.3/5 by tooblack09

tooblack09 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:32:02 +0000

I always wanted to ask you about who built the stonhenge. Heres what I concluded. When you see the pyramids in Africa, you just don’t see pyramids you a civilisation that prospered for centuries and also other sciences. When you see the stonehenge in England/Britain, that’s all see and nothing else. We all know that the ancient English/Brits have no place in antiquity. They ddin’t have no mounments until the Romans came there.

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by erby1kabogey

erby1kabogey — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:27:49 +0000

Fascinating to say the least! 2 bad I wasn’t taught any of this in science, I went to a catholic school so that explains why!

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by AsG1989

AsG1989 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:25:57 +0000

you can love science and look at the world in sheer beauty.

Comment on Ancient American Astrologic Masters pt.3/5 by moorishbrooklyn

moorishbrooklyn — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:17:34 +0000

About 60, 70 to 80 percent of Egypt was buried under sand, until everything was dug out. Stonehenge that you see is only an inner eye, small, tiny portion of what it really is. there is many books, documentaries on the History channel & Discovery that shows that Stonehenge is bigger, go back further than shown & is a giant observatory. The original Brits/Britons/Brutish was dark melanated people, Get a book call Ancient and Modern Britons by David Mac Ritchie. The original Druids were also dark.

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by Wulfenbach

Wulfenbach — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:57:15 +0000

its never tolate to study again

Comment on Growing up in the Universe – Episode 1 (3 of 6) by thisissick22

thisissick22 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:44:46 +0000

well i got your quote anyway.

Comment on Ancient American Astrologic Masters pt.3/5 by tooblack09

tooblack09 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:38:54 +0000

I heard a couple of moors talk about the Druids being black. When I researched the History of Halloween years ago I came across the Druids. I cannot recall all the info, but I remember it was some freaky stuff. When I read destruction of black civilization it mentioned about these very old skulls they found in Europe that were African. I’m gonna check out that book.

Comment on Ancient American Astrologic Masters pt.3/5 by chepe371

chepe371 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:23:59 +0000

@moorishbrooklyn

MoorishBrooklyn are you familiar with a great mathematician of our days called Karl Yung?

Comment on Programming Collective Intelligence in Bioinformatics by kwadade

kwadade — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:26:52 +0000

very informative dude.
Keep up the good work.

Comment on Programming Collective Intelligence in Bioinformatics by AdduJi

AdduJi — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:53:32 +0000

thanks

Comment on Programming Collective Intelligence in Bioinformatics by slashmanrox

slashmanrox — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:03:43 +0000

so how exactly would we bring together bioinformatics and regular web 2.0? i am into heuristics and automata theory. i have read collective intelligence and a fan of singularity theory, please explain as i am curious

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by abbesieyes

abbesieyes — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:08:22 +0000

Leonardo de Pisa and Pacioli were thieves and plagiarists.

Civilizations far older than Rome noted the valid and encoded said in multiple venues.

No secrets, no mysteries…just layers of lie placed over the valid. Plato notes it well in the parable of the cave.

Much ‘new age’ “thought”…continuation of a trade on ignorance by ‘Rome’.

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by stett99

stett99 — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:14:22 +0000

so he is a mason

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by 4449911

4449911 — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:23:55 +0000

Freemasonry was invented with the Book of Constitutions in 1717 … invented by the King to short-circuit the blame industry.

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by thegrandhouseofamen7

thegrandhouseofamen7 — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:31:04 +0000

Truly a brilliant man and a gift to humanity.

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by golu3990

golu3990 — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:25:07 +0000

What a perfect example of a poser who just doesn’t understand a word of what he’s saying!

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by VladMSTR

VladMSTR — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:29:52 +0000

this man is really nervous or he didn’t understand a word of what he is saing?? :D
vedic mumbo-jumbo. Eh if the great mathematicians of India like Brahmagupta hear that they would turn in their grave, hahah…

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by F3RA78

F3RA78 — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:33:29 +0000

@4449911 suck satans cock… looser

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by 4449911

4449911 — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:06:14 +0000

hehehe

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by eris4angel

eris4angel — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:56:08 +0000

you are a bitch

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by VladMSTR

VladMSTR — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:55:14 +0000

Do you understand what I am saying, or U R just too stupid , WOW Your argument is sooo strong like my hard bitch-dick , faggot.

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by VladMSTR

VladMSTR — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:08:24 +0000

Yes, to Youranus and nowhere else :D:D… cuz’ that’s some fucking shit, ”vedic mathematics” hah people not understanding math speaking about numerology :D:D…
”mumbo jumbo oh I’m so genius, and the harmony, mumbo-jumbo, and ….”

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by aharris08

aharris08 — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:55:08 +0000

96×95 is 9120 , not 9130

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by BlacksAreBeautiful

BlacksAreBeautiful — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:55:32 +0000

lol..nice catch!

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by gujjucheap

gujjucheap — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:08:10 +0000

fibanachi sequence invented in ndia oringinally called the brahmagupta sequence

Comment on Lec 9 | MIT 5.301 Chemistry Laboratory Techniques, IAP 2004 by zhouyibing

zhouyibing — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:50:53 +0000

Good

Comment on Lec 9 | MIT 5.301 Chemistry Laboratory Techniques, IAP 2004 by teddyterrorist

teddyterrorist — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:28:53 +0000

thank youuuuu

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by Fentro

Fentro — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:21:28 +0000

Jain is doing a commendable job at communicating the wondrous world of symmetry in mathematics as evidenced by natural math, i.e. ‘Sacred Geometry”. No one should be criticized for embracing, exploring, and sharing these beautiful truisms. If you don’t like his style, try someone else’s program, or go to college. But the hate speech is unnecessary and childish, and says more about your own inner troubles. I

Comment on Lec 9 | MIT 5.301 Chemistry Laboratory Techniques, IAP 2004 by srflamenco

srflamenco — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:13:55 +0000

won’t seeding create an impurity in the solution, and therefore create impure crystals? I thought the point to recrystalization was to extract PURE crystals

Comment on Lec 9 | MIT 5.301 Chemistry Laboratory Techniques, IAP 2004 by satanismybrother

satanismybrother — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:41:41 +0000

basically no. while your seed crystal might be slightly impure – the bulk of the material wont contain the impurity. When compounds crystallize it is a sign of high purity

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by loveandeyes

loveandeyes — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:28:11 +0000

look at you people, mob intellect on the individual scale! Check out the prussian 3 tier break down of their (past) educational system, seems like everyone on youtube falls under into the bottom 95% or illiterate uncompromising cancer.

Comment on Lec 9 | MIT 5.301 Chemistry Laboratory Techniques, IAP 2004 by PreDraKhan

PreDraKhan — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:27:33 +0000

If You Could Down Load Them Into Your Blinking Memory We Might Actually Learn…

Comment on Lec 9 | MIT 5.301 Chemistry Laboratory Techniques, IAP 2004 by 0Sebek0

0Sebek0 — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:27:18 +0000

funny

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by LoonyVision

LoonyVision — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:17:26 +0000

The fibonacci sequence wasn’t “invented.” How do you “event” something already in existence. It should accurately be stated that it was “discovered.”

Comment on Lec 9 | MIT 5.301 Chemistry Laboratory Techniques, IAP 2004 by RatkoUSA

RatkoUSA — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:14:02 +0000

Somewhat true, but inaccurate, if the process is performed incorrectly, or the original crystals formed in less than ideal conditiona, a number of things can occur, for instance impurities can become encapsulated within the crystals.

The technique demonstrated in the video is REcrystallization, obviously had the original crystals been “high purity” purification through recrystallization would serve no purpose.

Perhaps crystallization is a sign of at least relatively fair purity.

Comment on Lecture 7A | MIT 6.001 Structure and Interpretation, 1986 by Prüfungsvorbereitung Heilpraktiker Ausschnitt 1

Prüfungsvorbereitung Heilpraktiker Ausschnitt 1 — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:53:54 +0000

[...] The GenetiBlog » Blog Archive » Lecture 7A | MIT 6.001 Structure and Interpretation, 198… [...]

Comment on Lec 9 | MIT 5.301 Chemistry Laboratory Techniques, IAP 2004 by bepiozo

bepiozo — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:48:07 +0000

Totally irrelevant… but was that piano piece in the beginning Debussy?

Comment on Lec 9 | MIT 5.301 Chemistry Laboratory Techniques, IAP 2004 by reclusivesage

reclusivesage — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:46:05 +0000

Yeah, Arabesque 1.

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by dasgroover

dasgroover — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:42:23 +0000

8:41
In other multi-segmented film presentations of Indian History here on YouTube – the statement has been made that the decimal system appeared in the Gupta era – AD not BC – there is much of this that transpires repeatedly when the topic of Indian History arises – I believe it’s more likely a response to seek special status against the onslaught of the re-organization of human history since the libraries of Sumer have been translated into a dozens of world languages

Comment on Lec 9 | MIT 5.301 Chemistry Laboratory Techniques, IAP 2004 by vaibhav1803

vaibhav1803 — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:32:25 +0000

inexperienced lecturer spoils the fun..!!

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by karlkarlkarl1234

karlkarlkarl1234 — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:56:30 +0000

Is this guy an actual mathematician or just some dude whose eaten too much acid?

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by deekaljin

deekaljin — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:54:54 +0000

obviously it is too much acid

Comment on Lec 9 | MIT 5.301 Chemistry Laboratory Techniques, IAP 2004 by joshdkatz

joshdkatz — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:36:25 +0000

you seed it with pure product…

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by sifushox

sifushox — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:36:13 +0000

@aharris08 yes I noticed too, so what he wants to say with 9130, is he telling us some sistem for fast calculating or what, or maybe he thinks that his number is the right one, if its not a mistake then it is very funny lol

Comment on Lec 9 | MIT 5.301 Chemistry Laboratory Techniques, IAP 2004 by srflamenco

srflamenco — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:10:56 +0000

@joshdkatz o ok thanks

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by songbirdband

songbirdband — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:39:33 +0000

@4:58 – I was looking such Elastic Model a year ago to explain such interdimensional geometry-dynamics to my student – where to get such elastic rubber-plastic model? Is there any online shop? – Thanks my friends.

Comment on Lec 9 | MIT 5.301 Chemistry Laboratory Techniques, IAP 2004 by 16mcsf

16mcsf — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:37:32 +0000

hate the freaking music!

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by acidcrashguy

acidcrashguy — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:34:43 +0000

I guess he is just giving the ancient Indian perspective of mathematics. Sounds fascinating and interesting..

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by wenaolong

wenaolong — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:28:11 +0000

This man is incredible. Good on him!!!!

Comment on Jain – Sacred Geometry & Vedic Mathematics by LSD108

LSD108 — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:19:51 +0000

The fibonacci sequence wasn’t “discovered” either, its merely an expression of human observation of the universal experience.